ESS EXPO.08 to Provide Latest Trends, Innovative Solutions for EHS Software Users

If you haven’t already registered, here’s a personal invitation from me to join us at ESS EXPO.08 from Sunday, April 13 - Tuesday, April 15, at Sheraton Wild Horse Pass Resort outside Phoenix, Arizona.

ESS EXPO.08 is the largest software users’ conference of the year dedicated to Environmental, Health & Safety and Crisis Management. Attendees will see the latest technology innovations from ESS – with up-close looks at new versions of our software (Essential Suite™ version 7.1 and the browser-based version of Compliance Suite™) as well as quick tips and in-depth explanations from the experts who design, develop and support those tools. In addition, our training team will offer training courses that address key regulatory compliance issues and best practices.

Participants will hear the latest news about a variety of Governance, Risk and Compliance issues and information management challenges. Sessions like “Corporate Sustainability: Helping People and Businesses Reach Their Potential” by Microsoft and “REACH – Understanding and Implementing for Compliance” by PTK, Ltd — the firm that co-authored the regulation — provide a brief sample of the topics that will be discussed at this year’s ESS EXPO.

At ESS EXPO, you can meet your peers, exchange best practices and meet keynote speakers Simon Jacobson of AMR Research and racing icon Kyle Petty. Jacobson will provide an overview of enterprise trends, while Petty, of course, plans to talk about NASCAR and business success.

Our business partners will show how they can enable ESS users to achieve even greater success with complementary solutions and services. And finally, ESS software users will benefit from sharing their own ideas and experiences while networking with other top professionals from a wide variety of vertical industries.

ESS EXPO.08 continues the tremendous success of previous EXPO events, which have attracted hundreds of EHS and Crisis Management professionals.

Add comment February 13th, 2008

Industry Should Lead, Not Follow Regulations

There were three mine disasters in 2006 before the latest disaster at the Crandall mine in Utah. At the Crandall mine, a seismic event equivalent to a 3.9 magnitude earthquake trapped six miners. Days later, during the rescue effort, another collapse killed three rescuers, including a member of the Mine Safety and Health Administration. Weeks later, the company is still boring holes into the mine, trying to recover the bodies.

This has led the governor of Utah to investigate whether state mine safety regulations need to be tightened because federal regulations aren’t stringent enough. More significantly, OMB Watch has said “The Aug. 13 issue of Mine Safety and Health News reported that Dr. R. Larry Grayson, who heads the Pennsylvania State University mining and engineering program, agreed
…the mining company may have been following the MSHA-approved mining plan, but that does not mean that it was safe.”

This is a worrisome trend. Professors are second-guessing regulators, who are second-guessing the people in the industry itself.

What is really needed here is some thought about good incident management systems and real-time emergency response systems in the mining industry overall. There is actually a global need for stronger health and safety protection for the mining industry, including these incidents as well as the ones in China. Would a better emergency response or incident management
system have helped the rescue workers respond more efficiently? I think so. Good systems can be proactive, rather than reactive, even in situations that can’t be predicted, like seismic shifts.

OMB Watch goes on to point out that perhaps it is wrong to allow industry to comply voluntarily with regulations. A promotional email I got from them this morning said “Two recent stories exhibit the problems associated with
voluntary industry compliance with federal rules. In New York, Governor Elliot Spitzer is using state law to enforce a mandatory recall of children’s toys contaminated by lead paint. Spitzer cites the federal government’s weak voluntary recall system as reason for pursuing action at the state level.”

The writer goes on to discuss the use of “compliance assistance” in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Mine Safety and Health Administration in the Crandall disaster.

What is the takeaway from this? Industry should lead, not follow, the regulations. I don’t know one client of ours (or non-client for that matter), who would like to experience a disaster like Crandall if it could be anticipated. That’s what GRC initiatives are designed to address.

Add comment August 30th, 2007

Overseas Companies Looking for Health & Safety Solutions

I’m back in Asia, having meetings during the past week with customers and potential customers in the Philippines. I have found that companies that are not ready to tackle environmental problems are quite interested in health and safety solutions, especially software that is integrated with emergency management modules. Most executives had no idea that EH&S solutions existed that were part of a single platform devoted to Prevention, Mitigation, and Performance, appearing on their portals as unified data. The emergency management piece, which is part of our Mitigation offering, drew particular attention.

One of the most pressing issues around emergency management is the coordination of communications, and we were told repeatedly about needs in this area. I’m glad we’ve got something good to offer.

This is a long way from compliance, which is where we started building our software. We are now into the larger areas of operational risk, as part of governance, risk and compliance. When I look back, I have seen that our horizon has been expanding over the past ten or twelve years.

We are just following the lead of our customers who have begun to see their needs from a more strategic perspective. This week I learned from an article in the New York Times that many large corporations are now including a CSO (Chief Sustainability Officer) in the executive suite. The compliance officer reports to the CSO. I predict that this move from Compliance to Sustainability will be a fast-growing trend.

1 comment July 5th, 2007

Newmont Mining Sets New Standard for Forward-Thinking EH&S Policies

Newmont Mining is a Denver-based gold exploration company that’s listed on the S&P 500. I was searching online for interesting EH&S statistics and information, and when I typed EH&S into Google, Newmont came up on the first page of search results! That’s huge for a mining company.

And then I went to the website and saw the company’s sustainability initiative,
which it calls “Beyond the Mine.” This initiative is probably responsible for Newmont’s “Google juice” in EH&S searches. As part of this initiative, the company has instituted a three person board-level committee on health and safety, which is part of its corporate governance structure. The purpose of this committee is to advise and oversee management on environmental health and safety issues. The committee has the power to “investigate any activity of the Corporation and its subsidiaries relating to environmental, health or safety matters. The Committee has been, and shall be, granted unrestricted access to all information and all employees have been, and shall be, directed to cooperate as requested by members of the Committee. The Committee has the authority to retain, at the Corporation’s expense, persons having special competencies (including, without limitation, legal or other consultants and experts) to assist the Committee in fulfilling its responsibilities.”

This strikes me as a very forward-thinking policy for a company that does business globally, as Newmont does. And if you read further into it, the policy is designed to help them attract and retain workers, as well as exhibit corporate social responsibility.

I’m glad to see Newmont going in this direction.

Add comment June 22nd, 2007